1. Very few women would accuse a man they never met of rape unless she has serious mental issue/illness. If she happens to be mentally ill, it would be easy to diagnose and it would help CCP's case if they allow some foreign psychiatrists/experts to question her and diagnose her as such. But they are not allowing any foreigner to see her independently. Enough said.

2. She is a minor celebrity so she knows every well that celebrities run afoul of CCP disappear from the public view. For her to write an exposé like that. She has to be extremely desperate or extremely angry or both to ignore the consequences.

3. The entire incident is a real black eye for CCP and CCP needs to limit the negative press and control the narrative...

Of course, there is another way of looking at this entire incident:

Extreme Case 1: She is100% innocent rape victim. Well, that would mean a frail 77 year old had to restrain a healthy and fit athlete and physically penetrated her. That would make him the strongest frail senior.

Extreme Case 2: She is a mistress who is tired of her treatment and wanted out, so she concocted the rape story and details. Yet in this scenario, you would have to assume a calculating and scheming mistress like that would be stupid enough to overlook and risk the consequences of running afoul of CCP.

The truth is most likely to be somewhere in between these two extreme cases. BUT without any evidence, any conclusion is sheer speculation but it should be abundantly clear there is something going on between these two and something nefarious happened.