Thanks. That was the assumption: one-on-one scenario with no external cueing.
Replying to: Assuming a (very unrealistic) pure one-on-one scenario with no external cueing, -- Canis Majoris	Post Reply Forum

predicate

10/31/2015, 02:37:36

Author Profile | Edit

>> it would fire all 8 of the YJ-62's at the Lassen. All of these would be easily shot down

Will a Type 052D do better as it has YJ-83 or YJ-12?

Recommend | Alert |

Followups

Nope. It's really a matter of missile numbers rather than missile type. - Canis Majoris 10-31 05:15 | 1076 bytes |
Question:Can 52D shot down harpoons easily?Seems PLAN likes ballistic more than - ChairmanMaoHamet 10-31 03:23 | 272 bytes | +2
- Harpoon is really short range 130km ship-launched. I guess they need to chase. - predicate 10-31 13:51 | 259 bytes | +1
  - I'm pretty sure the Lassen doesn't even carry any Harpoons. [no text] - Canis Majoris 10-31 13:52 | 0 bytes | +1
    - Yep. I thought it carried the Harpoons. Still, they are shorter range than the - predicate 10-31 14:05 | 507 bytes | +1
      - As I said, the PLAN antiship weapons are worthless against the Lassen. - Canis Majoris 10-31 16:59 | 370 bytes | +1
        
        Re: As I said, the PLAN antiship weapons are worthless against the Lassen. - predicate 10-31 19:51 | 646 bytes | +2
        
        I didn't say that either. - Canis Majoris 11-01 03:48 | 413 bytes |
        How about the Indian Aegis ships against the Lassen? [no text] - superblaser 10-31 23:02 | 0 bytes |
- The 052D would be totally useless if it could not shoot down Harpoons easily. - Canis Majoris 10-31 05:25 | 162 bytes | +1
  - How about the 055 against the Lassen theoretically? [no text] - superblaser 10-31 22:59 | 0 bytes |