Not at all. I think Feng's assessment is right on in this article.
Replying to: Commentator is too negative about COMAC aviation projects. -- montyp165	Post Reply Forum

Canis Majoris

11/13/2015, 10:11:08

Author Profile | Edit

Recommend | Alert |

Followups

Re: His assessment has a massive flaw - Lin dan 11-13 13:12 | 647 bytes | +1
- And where is his "massive flaw" listed in your post here? [no text] - Canis Majoris 11-13 13:20 | 0 bytes | +1
  - Did he bother to take into consideration of massive China aviation market? No! [no text] - lin dan 11-13 13:24 | 0 bytes | +1
    - And how does the massive China aviation market conflict with his article? [no text] - Canis Majoris 11-13 18:58 | 0 bytes | +1
      - Whyd do you think a massive domestic aviation market do not lies with success? - lin dan 11-14 00:33 | 1431 bytes | +1
        
        And how does any of this conflict with that article? [no text] - Canis Majoris 11-14 05:02 | 0 bytes | +1
        
        If this C919 sold more than a thousand.... - lin dan 11-14 05:29 | 244 bytes | +1
        
        Where did he say C919 is NOT going to be a "success"? Point it out if you can. [no text] - Canis Majoris 11-14 05:31 | 0 bytes |
Well, sharing the same suppliers as Airbus and Boeing simplifies things... - montyp165 11-13 10:22 | 131 bytes |