用户注册 登录
珍珠湾全球网 返回首页

MingHao的个人空间 https://zzwave.com/?15580 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

日志

罗明瀚:The Wasting of the Evangelical Mind

已有 115 次阅读2025-3-5 10:02 |个人分类:学习笔记|系统分类:转帖-知识

美国的教会——尤其是白人新教福音派——是如何落得如此境地的?对于许多怀疑论者来说,原因似乎显而易见:信仰和理性是对立的——前者必然会抵消后者,反之亦然。
然而,培养思想生活一直是基督教历史上的一个重要潮流,它承认知识追求可以荣耀上帝。在中世纪,修道院成为学习中心,并催生了第一批欧洲大学。托马斯·阿奎那的
著作融合了亚里士多德哲学和基督教神学,为协调科学知识与圣经真理制定了框架。领导新教改革的马丁·路德是普及教育的早期倡导者,他认为教育贫困青年至关重要,
“这样城市才能享受暂时的和平与繁荣”。清教徒牧师乔纳森·爱德华兹在他的著作和布道中努力探讨形而上学和认识论。在二十世纪,C. S. 刘易斯和莱因霍尔德·尼布尔作为
基督教公共知识分子广受赞誉。T. S. 艾略特和 W. H. 奥登等作家的艺术创作以神学上正统的基督教为中心。

然而,美国的福音派却以反智主义为特征。最受欢迎和最有影响力的牧师的风格往往与肤浅相关魅力胜过专业知识;科学权威常常受到怀疑。因此,美国福音派很容易受到
煽动和错误信息的攻击,这并不奇怪。历史学家理查德·霍夫施塔特在 20 世纪 60 年代麦卡锡主义泛滥之后撰写了一篇经典研究《美国生活中的反智主义》,其中探讨了美国
某些态度和思想,这些态度和思想汇聚在一起,产生了“对精神生活及其代表的怨恨和怀疑”。他认为美国福音派是罪魁祸首。1994 年,当时担任伊利诺伊州惠顿学院教授的
历史学家马克·诺尔(Mark Noll)出版了《福音派思想的丑闻》。在这本书的第一章开篇,他写道:“福音派思想的丑闻在于,福音派思想并不多。”


How did the church in America––particularly, its white Protestant evangelical manifestation––end up here? For many skeptics, the explanation seems obvious: faith and reason are antipodes––the former necessarily cancels out the latter, and vice versa. Cultivating the life of the mind, however, has been an important current throughout much of Christianity’s history, a recognition that intellectual pursuits can glorify God. During the Middle Ages, monasteries became centers of learning and gave rise to the first European universities. The writings of Thomas Aquinas, which blended Aristotelian philosophy and Christian theology, set out a framework for reconciling scientific knowledge with scriptural truths. Martin Luther, who led the Protestant Reformation, was an early advocate of universal education and argued that educating needy youth was vital “in order that a city might enjoy temporal peace and prosperity.” The Puritan minister Jonathan Edwards grappled with metaphysics and epistemology in his writings and sermons. In the twentieth century, C. S. Lewis and Reinhold Niebuhr enjoyed popular acclaim as Christian public intellectuals. T. S. Eliot and W. H. Auden are among the writers whose theologically orthodox Christianity served as a focal point of their art.

Evangelicalism in America, however, has come to be defined by its anti-intellectualism. The style of the most popular and influential pastors tend to correlate with shallowness: charisma trumps expertise; scientific authority is often viewed with suspicion. So it is of little surprise that American evangelicals have become vulnerable to demagoguery and misinformation. In a classic study, “Anti-Intellectualism in American Life,” the historian Richard Hofstadter, writing in the nineteen-sixties, during the aftermath of the excesses of McCarthyism, examined certain attitudes and ideas in the United States that had converged to produce a “resentment and suspicion of the life of the mind and of those who are considered to represent it.” He saw American evangelicalism as a chief culprit. In 1994, Mark Noll, a historian who was then a professor at Wheaton College in Illinois, the preëminent evangelical liberal-arts institution, published “The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind.” In the opening sentence of the book’s first chapter, he writes, “The scandal of the evangelical mind is there is not much of an evangelical mind.”



路过

鸡蛋

鲜花

支持

雷人

难过

搞笑
 

评论 (0 个评论)

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 用户注册

Archiver|手机版|珍珠湾全球网

GMT+8, 2025-3-28 03:28 , Processed in 0.010057 second(s), 8 queries , Memcache On.

Powered by Discuz! X2.5

回顶部