切换至摄影模板
博文
贝克及其粉丝的首要特征是不诚实
如前所述，贺梅案中关键一点是1999年6月的一个监护权移交文件，对此文件，贺家的作证是该监护权移交是临时的，只是为了给贺梅办保险。贝克的证词是，该移交是永久的，贝克得到永久抚养贺梅的权利。
谁说了假话？
贝克及其粉丝的首要特征是不诚实，dishonest。我在15点申明中严格证明了主审的CHILDERS法官是个LIAR，这也被英文媒体报道了。LIAR们是可耻的。
对比贝克、尤牧师、克劳德的证词就知道了。
先看贝克证词：
321
9 Q. Ms. Baker, I'm going to ask you that
10 question again. After you said the phrase, "This
11 visit was very discouraging to us," the very next
12 sentence you stated was -- and correct me if I'm
13 wrong -- "They wanted to see if they could come
14 and get Anna and keep her for the day next
15 Sunday. I told them, no." Did you say that?
16 A. I absolutely did.
17 Q. And Ms. He did not get upset until
18 after you told her, "No." Isn't that right?
19 A. She wouldn't have no reason to get
20 upset before, no.
21 Q. So how do you define a good visit or a
22 non-discouraging visit?
23 A. I guess when she's not upset. That's
24 the majority of the bad visits is when she was
322
1 upset and screaming and crying.
2 Q. Isn't it also true that you define a
3 good visit as one of those visits where Ms. He
4 doesn't want the child for more than an hour or
5 she doesn't want to take to the child out of the
6 house?
7 A. No.
8 Q. It's your testimony today under oath
9 that the arrangement that you had on June 4th,
10 1999 with the Hes was a permanent arrangement?
11 You had every intention on June 4th, 1999 of
12 having permanent legal and parental custody of
13 this child?
14 A. Our agreement was that we would raise
15 her for the rest of her life.
16 Q. Do you recall discussing this case in a
17 CASA report? Do you recall a CASA investigator
18 interviewing you about this case back in Juvenile
19 Court?
20 A. I recall one being at our home.
21 Q. Do you recall that his name was Chris
22 Korejo?
23 A. It's a her.
24 Q. Do you recall that to be her name?
323
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. And am I correct in saying that the
3 interview occurred just before the Juvenile Court
4 hearing with Judge Claudia Haltom?
5 A. I believe so.
6 Q. And did you tell that CASA worker just
7 before the Juvenile Court hearing with Judge
8 Claudia Haltom, that the Bakers -- that you would
9 seek permanent, legal and parental custody of the
10 minor child? Did you tell her that?
11 A. I don't recall telling her that, no.
12 Q. Would you like to take a look at the
13 report?
14 A. I've never seen the report. So I don't
15 know.
16 MR. SIEGEL: Your Honor, this is
17 also the same report that is attached to the
18 report of the guardian ad litem. So it would be
19 excepted from the hearsay rule.
20 BY MR. SIEGEL:
21 Q. Ms. Baker, do you see the very last
22 sentence on that CASA report dated June 28th of
23 the year 2000?
24 A. Yes, I see the sentence.
324
1 Q. Would you read that for the record?
2 A. It said, "The Bakers stated they would
3 seek permanent, legal, parental custody of Anna
4 Mae."
5 Q. And would you agree that the use of the
6 word "would" implies some event that is going to
7 take place in the future?
8 A. I guess that's what "would" would mean.
PASTOR YAU证词
Q. And what specifically ― based on that, what
specifically did you explain to Ms. He?
A. In summary ― you know, I can’t recall the word
for word question ― said that because the Hes were
unable to financially support the baby at that time,
that some family was willing to take care of their
baby on their behalf, but because of the legal
procedure that necessitate to buy insurance or to
administer medication or whatever to the baby by
the custodian, Ms. He needs to give the authority
to the custodian by signing a document.
Q. Did you hear the word “temporary” in that meeting?
A. Yes.
SARA CLOUD（法庭工作人员）证词
Q. All right, and did either Mr. or Mrs. He tell
you that they wanted the Bakers to take care of their
child on a permanent basis?
A. No.
Q. Did the Hes ever say anything to you that
indicated to you that they were interested in either
a temporary or permanent arrangement?
A. Temporary.
Q. Can you tell us what you recall?
A. I recall mainly talking to Casey, that she was
very concerned that it was not a permanent situation.
She did not want it to be a permanent situation.
Q. She made that very clear to you?
A. Yes, sir.
. . . .
Q. When Mr. and Mrs. Baker and Mr. and Mrs. He were
before you on June 4 of 1999, did they appear to
be in agreement?
A. Yes.
Q. It did not appear to be a contested matter. Is
that correct?
A. No.
Q. You understood Ms. He, through the interpreter,
to wanting this matter to be temporary only. Is that
your understanding?
A. Yes.
. . . .
Q. If you understood that Mr. and Mrs. Baker wanted
language in the consent order that said that, “We
will be able to raise this child until she’s 18 years
of age,” would you consider that to be consistent
with what Ms. He understood on that day?
A. No.
. . . .
Q. Ms. Cloud, what was the agreement that you were
so sure that all parties had consented to? Was it
temporary or permanent?
A. Temporary.
. . . .
Q. Temporary because it could be changed; right?
A. That would be one of the reasons, but I believe
Casey was fairly adamant that at some point she
wanted her child back.
Q. And what specifically ― based on that, what
specifically did you explain to Ms. He?
A. In summary ― you know, I can’t recall the word
for word question ― said that because the Hes were
unable to financially support the baby at that time,
that some family was willing to take care of their
baby on their behalf, but because of the legal
procedure that necessitate to buy insurance or to
administer medication or whatever to the baby by
the custodian, Ms. He needs to give the authority
to the custodian by signing a document.
Q. Did you hear the word “temporary” in that meeting?
A. Yes.
SARA CLOUD（法庭工作人员）证词
Q. All right, and did either Mr. or Mrs. He tell
you that they wanted the Bakers to take care of their
child on a permanent basis?
A. No.
Q. Did the Hes ever say anything to you that
indicated to you that they were interested in either
a temporary or permanent arrangement?
A. Temporary.
Q. Can you tell us what you recall?
A. I recall mainly talking to Casey, that she was
very concerned that it was not a permanent situation.
She did not want it to be a permanent situation.
Q. She made that very clear to you?
A. Yes, sir.
. . . .
Q. When Mr. and Mrs. Baker and Mr. and Mrs. He were
before you on June 4 of 1999, did they appear to
be in agreement?
A. Yes.
Q. It did not appear to be a contested matter. Is
that correct?
A. No.
Q. You understood Ms. He, through the interpreter,
to wanting this matter to be temporary only. Is that
your understanding?
A. Yes.
. . . .
Q. If you understood that Mr. and Mrs. Baker wanted
language in the consent order that said that, “We
will be able to raise this child until she’s 18 years
of age,” would you consider that to be consistent
with what Ms. He understood on that day?
A. No.
. . . .
Q. Ms. Cloud, what was the agreement that you were
so sure that all parties had consented to? Was it
temporary or permanent?
A. Temporary.
. . . .
Q. Temporary because it could be changed; right?
A. That would be one of the reasons, but I believe
Casey was fairly adamant that at some point she
wanted her child back.
Read more: 贝克及其粉丝的首要特征是不诚实 - 岳东晓的日志 - 贝壳村 -
发表评论 评论 (4 个评论)
- 回复 就不告诉你
- 直接讲吧，省得你们不明白：支持岳东晓的就是正义，正直的明白人。反对或者不支持岳东晓的就是虚伪，阴险，不诚实的人。道理很简单：
1. 岳东晓就是正义的化身，还专门代表大的正义，小正义都不屑代。
2. 根据1，地球上和地球外的人和非人（就像律师和非律师）都一定会支持岳东晓。你假装不支持，其实心里特支持，不是不诚实是什么？
- 回复 linling1013
- 纽约出了个海明就够了，请你滚出去。。。别翻旧账，死不要脸的东西。。。
