切换至摄影模板
博文
桑兰方回应莫虎撤诉动议的截止日期为7月25日
| 但口头辩论时间将安排在海明修改状纸的动议之后进行。 这符合逻辑。如果法院批准修改状纸，理论上说被告的撤诉动议就脱靶或部分脱靶了。 Lan v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al Assigned to: Judge Leonard B. Sand Referred to: Magistrate Judge James C. Francis Demand: $9,999,000 Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act | Date Filed: 04/28/2011 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: Federal Question |
| Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
| 07/11/2011 | 46 | ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Leonard B. Sand from Hugh H. Mo dated 6/30/11 re: Defendants have filed two Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 12(b)(1), on June 19 and 24, 2011, Docket Entries #28 and #34, respectively. We have conferred with plaintiff's counsel regarding a joint briefing schedule for both of these motions, and have reached an agreement on consent that: Plaintiff's answering papers to both motions must be served on or before July 25, 2011; and, Defendants' reply papers as to both motions must be served on or before August 5, 2011. ENDORSEMENT: Oral argument will be scheduled upon resolution of motion to amend. So ordered (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 7/6/11) (djc) (Entered: 07/11/2011) |
发表评论 评论 (7 个评论)
- 回复 清流见底
To: 岳东晓 你曾经说:
看来，莫虎与海明必须分出胜负来了。
一旦超过21天时限没有纠正，则违规就构成既成事实，再纠正都晚了。海明即使在之后撤诉，这个rule 11还会进行。很多rule 11是在案子结束之后才开打。
- 回复 岳东晓
To: 清流见底 你曾经说:
一旦超过21天时限没有纠正，则违规就构成既成事实，再纠正都晚了。海明即使在之后撤诉，这个rule 11还会进行。很多rule 11是在案子结束之后才开打。
对不起，我不是想知道这两个动议的概念，我是想知道，如果明天莫虎发出惩罚动议，到那时，海明还有机会在不受惩罚的情况下撤诉吗？
- 回复 清流见底
To: 岳东晓 你曾经说:
对不起，我不是想知道这两个动议的概念，我是想知道，如果明天莫虎发出惩罚动议，到那时，海明还有机会在不受惩罚的情况下撤诉吗？
惩罚动议指律师没有进行事实或法律上的称职的研究，或者出于不当目的。
撤诉动议是说，即使控诉的内容都是真的，案件也不成立。
- 回复 岳东晓
To: 清流见底 你曾经说:
惩罚动议指律师没有进行事实或法律上的称职的研究，或者出于不当目的。
请问岳博士：莫虎的惩罚动议与撤诉动议的关系？
撤诉动议是说，即使控诉的内容都是真的，案件也不成立。
