倍可亲

岳东晓 (已有 1,096,171 人访问过博主空间)

http://www.backchina.com//u/293539

历史揭秘:为什么大量志愿军战俘去了台湾

作者:岳东晓  于 2012-5-7 13:34 发表于 最热闹的华人社交网络--贝壳村 作者分类:历史军事|通用分类:热点杂谈|已有8评论

关键词:历史, 台湾, 志愿军战俘

 朝鲜战争停战后,美国发明所谓自愿遣返原则,说是让战俘自愿选择去哪。

根据《Korea, The War Before Vietnam》一书记载,大量国民党特务被麦克阿瑟输入战俘营,在战俘营内施行血腥恐怖,强迫志愿军战俘去台湾。其基本策略就是对表达愿意回国的志愿军 进行残酷迫害,甚至加以杀害。当时主持战俘甄别的中立国家组织NNRC建议将已经表达愿望的战俘分离出来,而不是让其回到原战俘营与其他战俘住在一起。对 此,美国强烈反对,因为他们知道,如果把战俘中的国民党分子与其他人分开,则很多战俘会选择回国(” then very appreciable numbers of the prisoners may switch and elect repatriation")。由于美国的反对,NNRC的建议未能被采纳。

最后,在1万4千多名去台湾的志愿军战俘中,只有2085人经过了所谓的甄别,其余志愿军战俘都是被强制运往台湾。

相关事实参见下列专著: 《Korea, The War Before Vietnam》。


《Korea, The War Before Vietnam》, Callum A. MacDonald  (geo-politic study based on official documents, many recently declassfied,  honest and scholarly on many political issues)    



"In the Chinese camps, the leaders were ex-Guomindong [Kuo-Min-Tang, KMT] soldiers drafted into the PLA after 1949,... this group used 'brutal force' to attain control and force POWs to express their loyalty to the Guomindong. Terror was reinforced by manipulation of essential supplies which were distributed by compound leaders. The choice for the average POW was often to conform or to starve. The situation was tolerated by the camp administration which ... was sympathetic to the anti-communist cause....The Chinese [KMT camp leaders] were in contact with Taiwan through Guomindong personnel in the camp administration".


How did KMT agents get there? From files of the Far East Command, "In January 1951 MacArthur requested 20 linguists  from Taiwan who were selected by Jiang's Ministry of Defense. In February 1951 he asked additional 55 and despatched a staff officer to Taiwan to coordinate psychological warfare programmes with Guomindong regime. Muccio recalled that 75 personnel were recruited on Taiwan who were 'doubtless members of the Chang Kai-Shek's Gestapo'."


"After the cease-fire, repatriate POWs were exchanged in OPERATION BIG SWITCH and the non-repatriates turned over to the NNRC [Neutral Nations Repatriation Commission] and the Indian Custodial Force in the DMZ for 'explanations'. The Americans recognised that ...Once outside the UNC control there was no guarantee that large numbers of POWs would not opt for repatriation.... Their main worry was that the prisoners would somehow be separated from the anti-communist leadership which had imposed order in the compounds."


To avert the situation in which many POWs switch to repatriate, US mounted a intensive propaganda campaign with the assistance of the KMT regime, camp leaders held screening to weed any 'communist elements' which remained.


NNRC proposed a rule to segregate POWs who received explanation from those who had not. Americans consider this to be extremely dangerous and objected to it strongly. US news correspondents at Panmunjom warned, "If the Communists succeed in separating anti-Communist leaders from [their] respective compounds, then very appreciable numbers of the prisoners may switch and elect repatriation".


The Americans scored a victory in opposing the NNRC proposal, the anti-Communists elements would appear at the beginning of the explanation and disrupt the proceedings. "Thus the explanations were marked by abuse and violence."  "As a result, the mass of POWs was never interviewed. " "Of the Chinese 2085 out of 14700 were screened".


"In a separate report, the Swedes and Swiss agreed that 'The attitude of prisoners of war in respect of explanations has...been influenced and coordinated by organizations of a political nature....acts of violence and even murders have been committed." 
 

So, almost 2/3 of the Chinese POWs were sent to Taiwan.


Upon this victory, US government proclaimed: "They will remember that freedom is the popular choice, and the desire for freedom can overcome even the most intense indoctrination and brutal discipline. We in the free world have a special right to feel proud today. we have stood by a principle and won."    


  博主二维码,光标右键点图片可下载

高兴

感动

同情

搞笑

难过

拍砖

支持
3

鲜花

刚表态过的朋友 (3 人)

发表评论 评论 (8 个评论)

回复 蓝天绿地 2012-5-7 15:14
后来有的人从台湾去了美国,听说Stony Brooks State  University of NY 当年有个小中国食品商店,华人学生经常光顾,老板曾是志愿军班长。

我看过凤凰卫视的中国远征军大型纪录片,这部片子让我真切地理解什么叫打仗。很不好意思,看过许许多多地雷站只类电影和书籍,可是现在才知道打仗有多么残酷。从头到尾留着泪,战争完全是另外一种天地,不能用和平时候的道理来解释。

估计他们会说战俘回去会枪毙,另外战俘许多人本来就是国民党部队收遍的。
回复 VANO 2012-5-7 22:43
有没有关于朝鲜战争的电影?介绍一个链接吧。
回复 8288 2012-5-8 01:20
VANO: 有没有关于朝鲜战争的电影?介绍一个链接吧。
http://www.56.com/w19/album-aid-8584770.html
回复 岳东晓 2012-5-8 03:02
蓝天绿地: 后来有的人从台湾去了美国,听说Stony Brooks State  University of NY 当年有个小中国食品商店,华人学生经常光顾,老板曾是志愿军班长。

我看过凤凰卫视的中 ...
“估计他们会说战俘回去会枪毙,另外战俘许多人本来就是国民党部队收遍的。”

这样是不能让人背景离乡的。国民党的做法是对那些坚决要求回国的以极为残忍的手法杀害,对其余的在身上刺上反共口号。
回复 蓝天绿地 2012-5-8 03:20
岳东晓: “估计他们会说战俘回去会枪毙,另外战俘许多人本来就是国民党部队收遍的。”

这样是不能让人背景离乡的。国民党的做法是对那些坚决要求回国的以极为残忍的手法 ...
     
回复 VANO 2012-5-8 05:21
谢谢,我今晚下班就看。
回复 yuandao 2012-5-8 19:49
毛泽东为何不把自己的土八路兵送去抗美援朝?!
被送去战场送死的,被俘虏之后,当然选择国民党所在地!
后来的历史证明,去台湾的俘虏全部安置良好,并且老有所归!
反观回去中国的俘虏,下场如何?!至今又如何?就是最好的证明!
回复 呆子 2012-5-25 13:13
我一个朋友的爸爸就是战俘回来的,无语。。。。。

facelist doodle 涂鸦板

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

岳东晓最受欢迎的博文
  1. 目前所见最壮观的海啸视频 [2011/03]
  2. 建议旅日华人尽早逃命--日本核反应堆氢爆分析 [2011/03]
  3. 日本核堆再次起火,落砂机时报质疑为何日本不如中国 [2011/03]
  4. 贺梅姐弟妹三人平安回到中国(图、真相) [2011/08]
  5. 美国人7年前就已预见日本将成为核废墟 [2011/03]
  6. 日军暴露出战斗力低下 [2011/03]
  7. 为什么8.9级地震日本房子没倒 [2011/03]
  8. 桑兰案律师已经势成骑虎 [2011/05]
  9. 与贺梅父母的通话(2011/07/02) [2011/07]
  10. 海明应坦诚回应公众对他履历的怀疑 [2011/06]
  11. 贺梅将于近日返回中国 [2011/08]
  12. 桑兰案海明服软,承认错误、向被告道歉并作出赔偿 [2012/03]
  13. 技术歧视-拉登被击杀竟然是现场直播 [2011/05]
  14. 桑兰案状纸被法院拒收--搞路不清就上联邦法院 [2011/05]
  15. 日本核反应堆会发生核爆吗? [2011/03]
  16. 桑兰律师不长进,两个动议均被扔出法院 [2011/06]
  17. 网友呼叫海明 [2011/06]
  18. 贺梅母亲解答有关贺梅子妹三人来美国费用的问题 [2011/08]
  19. 群众游行导致大规模军事镇压其实是法制建设不完善的后果 [2011/06]
  20. 给贝克捐款的人应该至少替他把用于剥夺罗秦父母权的律师费交了 [2011/08]
  21. 贺梅来美的思维定式看劣等洋奴的弱智 [2011/08]
  22. 罗秦严正警告使用贺梅名义与形象骗捐的个人与团体 [2011/09]
  23. 为贝克募捐的人应该向贝克、罗秦道歉 [2011/08]
  24. 探讨贺梅案中可能存在的种族问题 [2011/09]
  25. 天安门挡坦克的青年证明解放军是人民的军队 [2012/06]

关于本站 | 隐私权政策 | 免责条款 | 版权声明 | 联络我们 |手机版

Copyright © 2001-2013 海外华人中文门户:倍可亲 (http://www.backchina.com) All Rights Reserved.

程序系统基于 Discuz! X3.1 商业版 优化 Discuz! © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

本站时间采用京港台时间 最新更新:GMT+8, 2014-12-27 11:10

返回顶部