海明律师于2011年7月15日申请延期其回应RULE 11的时间90天,或者等到被告的两个撤诉动议之后。桑兰律师称与保险公司被告和解后,他有若干事情要做。而且,若被告的撤诉动议被拒绝,则被告RULE 11惩处动议也就没有意义了。
联邦法院副法官拒绝此申请。命令海明在7月29日之前递交回应。莫虎的回答(optional)截止日期设在8月5日。
其实,法官们并不是对外面的世界一无所知。海明有那么多时间接待媒体,写博客,喝酒到凌晨,也应该有时间写法律文件。
Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
---|
07/18/2011 | | ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis from Ming Hai dated 7/15/11 re: counsel for plaintiff respectfully requests an extension of time for the plaintiff/her attorney to submit an opposition to Defendants Rule 11 Sanction Motion for 90 days or until determinations of the two pending "Motions to Dismiss", whichever is later. ENDORSEMENT: Application denied. Plaintiff shall answer the Rule 11 motion by July 29, 2011, and defendants shall reply by August 5, 2011. ( Responses due by 7/29/2011, Replies due by 8/5/2011.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 7/18/11) (pl) (Entered: 07/18/2011) |
博主二维码,光标右键点图片可下载