Canis Majoris 
08/02/2022, 17:20:36
Author Profile | Edit
|
Sinbad said there was precedent for Pelosi's visit. You said there was also precedent for China being gangraped. Your argument only makes any kind of remote sense if they are the same kind of precedent, deserving the same kind of response, otherwise one precedent being repeated isn't nearly the same thing as the other being repeated. Which it isn't. Not even remotely. Just because they are both "precedents" doesn't mean one has jack schitt to do with the other.
|
