珍珠湾

岳东晓

Zhen Zhu Wan Online Community Club of Elite Chinese

Zhen Zhu Wan Online Community Club of Elite Chinese


I have great doubts about this EMdrive thing
Replying to: Chinese EM engine prototype tested in space craft -- Pandagon C-in-C Post ReplyForum


Khan

01/04/2017, 17:15:50




Author Profile | Edit


I think it is just another "cold fusion" moment.
 
Costella points out the error that Shawyer makes: http://johncostella.webs.com/shawyerfraud.pdf
 
Shawyer got the directions of some of the force arrows wrong. Look at Shawyer's diagram of the tapered waveguide: http://www.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/av/shawyertheory.pdf
 

Northwestern Polytechnical University[edit]

In 2008, a team of Chinese researchers led by Juan Yang (杨涓), professor of propulsion theory and engineering of aeronautics and astronautics at Northwestern Polytechnical University (NWPU) in Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, said that they had developed a valid electro-magnetic theory behind a microwave resonant cavity thruster.[6][93] A demonstration version of the drive was built and tested with different cavity shapes and at higher power levels in 2010. Using an aerospace engine test stand usually used to precisely test spacecraft engines like ion drives,[5][42][43] they reported a maximum thrust of 720 mN at 2,500 W of input power.[43] Yang noted that her results were tentative, and said she "[was] not able to discuss her work until more results are published".[5] This positive result was over 100x more thrust per input power than any other experiment, and inspired other groups to try to replicate their work. However in a followup paper, Yang could not reproduce the 2010 observation and suggested it was due to experimental error.[7]

In 2016, Yang's team published a paper, in which they refined their experimental setup, using a three-wire torsion pendulum to measure thrust. They tested two different power setups. In one trial, the power system was outside the cavity: in this case, they observed a "thrust" of 8-10 mN. In a second trial, the power system was within the cavity, and they measured no such thrust. Instead they observed an insignificant thrust below their noise threshold of 3 mN, fluctuating between ±0.7 mN with a measurement uncertainty of 80%. They concluded that they were unable to measure significant thrust; that "thrust" measured when using external power sources (as in their 2010 experiment) could be noise; and that it was important to use self-contained power systems for these experiments, and more sensitive pendulums with lower torsional stiffness.[7]

 

 





Recommend | Alert |
Where am IGo Up Go TopPost ReplyBack

�������ʿ֪ʶ��Ȩ����ʤ

Copyright Infringement Jury Trial Verdict

Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Software Jury Trial Verdict

Judge James Ware Presiding: Copyright Infringement Trial

Copyright Trial Attorney

Ninth Circuit Copyright Law - Copyright Jury Trial